They shook a little at all speeds, but not enough that it became difficult to see what's behind. Standing upright on the pegs made for serene cruising for the ears, but wasn't very practical.Īnother cause for minor irritation was the mirrors. Trying to creep down behind the fairing only made it worse sitting as upright as possible with only the fingertips on the handlebar grips made it tolerable. The end result was annoying turbulence that manifested itself as painful noise inside the helmet at speed. It was too steep and cut at the wrong height. The most annoying part was the windscreen. I still will not say it was a comfortable bike, it's just that I didn't feel any worse after 5 hours on the road than I did when jumping on board. I never suffered a sore bum or a stiff neck, or any other discomfort while riding on the bike a first for me after riding for 25 years and having owned 18 bikes previously at the time of ownership. The result was that I, at least, never got stale or sore on the bike. In addition, it felt natural to move the feet around on the pegs, and also adjust the angle of the torso along with the weight placed on the hands. However, the seat was expansive and allowed quite a bit of fore and aft movement. It wasn't as dramatic as a pure race replica, but it was a lot closer to that than a Gold Wing, to put it like that. My legs were severely folded in order to fit on top of the high placed pegs, and the reach to the bars was quite substantial (for the record, I'm 180 cm (5'11”) and 90 kg net (200 lbs) with short legs and a long torso). The seating position wasn't comfortable the moment I sat on it, though. My skepticism was completely unfounded, though, because the bike was beyond comparison the least tiring bike I have ever ridden. I was also skeptical about the dramatic forward lean required to reach the low clip-ons, particularly since I've done most of my riding on “standard” bikes with much more upright riding positions. Mechanically it seemed to be in good order, with the rear tyre showing off the most wear, with only about 1/3 left of its life. The bike had almost 46,000 kilometers (around 28,000 miles) on the dial at the time of purchase. The differences between the two are negligible the most important change for an owner to know about is that the 1996 model and later uses different spark plugs. While my bike was made in 1994, it was first registered in 1996. As a result, idle speed was a little erratic, and revs took a bit long to go down. One carb diaphragm split and needed replacement.įor whatever reason, cylinder #4 refused to come into synch with the other 3 cylinders, no matter how it was adjusted. One ignition coil died after a spark plug cap cracked and sent sparks everywhere but to the spark plug.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |